Black Rectangle Home Event Calendar Contact Search Sitemap

OMNI LogoSlogan

Yellow Rectangle Wood
Beige Rectangle About OMNIServicesEnvironmental NewsCareerTechnical BulletinsResources
White Line

 

Check out
OMNI's Environmental Health and Safety Newsletter


Volume 6 Issue 2
Volume 6 Issue 1

Volume 5 Issue 2
Volume 5 Issue 1

Volume 4 Issue 1

Volume 3 Issue 3
Volume 3 Issue 2
Volume 3 Issue 1

Volume 2 Issue 2
Volume 2 Issue 1

Volume 1 Issue 3
Volume 1 Issue 2
Volume 1 Issue 1


SpacerOMNI Newsletter - Volume 4 Issue 1
Gray Line

Changes to Federal Wetlands Policy

Wetlands are believed to be among the most environmentally beneficial areas in the nation. They include marshes, swamps, bogs, and similar areas that have developed between open water and dry land. Because wetlands have unique soils and plants, they provide food and habitat for fish and wildlife, provide water purification, erosion control, flood control during major storms, water recharge during droughts, and dry weather, and recreation benefits.

On January 10, 2003 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced new actions that will help clarify the Clean Water Act's (CWA) requirements for protection of the nation's wetlands. The new actions indicate the following:

  • Field staff should continue to assert jurisdiction over traditional navigable waters (and adjacent wetlands) and, generally speaking, their tributary systems (and adjacent wetlands).
  • Field staff should not assert CWA jurisdiction over isolated waters that are both intrastate and non-navigable, where the sole basis available for asserting CWA jurisdiction rests on any of the factors listed in the "Migratory Bird Rule".
  • The CWA protects wetlands, streams, and other waters from discharges of pollutants by requiring permits with appropriate environmental safeguards before a discharge may be authorized. In the SWANCC case, the Supreme Court held that the Corps had exceeded its CWA regulatory authority in asserting jurisdiction over isolated intrastate non-navigable ponds based on the Migratory Bird Rule.

These actions, which reaffirm federal authority over the vast majority of America's wetlands, are in response to the Supreme Court's 2001 decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County vs. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC), which limited federal authority under the CWA to regulate certain isolated wetlands. In North Carolina, aside from federal CWA section 404 dredge and fill requirements, persons who engage in construction activities (including clearing, grading, and excavation) that disturb five or more acres are required to obtain a federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater permit. In addition, a sedimentation and erosion control permit must be obtained from local governments or the North Carolina Division of Land Resources for land disturbances of one or more acres. Stormwater permit may also be required.

The federal agencies also issued new mitigation guidance and a "National Wetlands Mitigation Action Plan" on December 26, 2002. The Plan identifies a number of issues involving compensatory mitigation requirements for which an interagency team will develop additional guidance over the next several years. These include:

  • Developing performance standards for monitoring and management of mitigation sites.
  • Developing a model mitigation plan checklist for permit application.
  • Defining criteria for making compensatory mitigation decisions within a watershed context.
  • Protecting wetlands for which "mitigation", restoration, or creation is not feasible or scientifically "viable".

Continued pg. 4

 

Continue to Page 4

Gray Dotted Line

 

 

Subscribe to OMNI's Newsletter