Black Rectangle Home Event Calendar Contact Search Sitemap

OMNI Logo Slogan

Beige Rectangle Beige Cloth
Beige Rectangle About OMNIServicesEnvironmental NewsCareerTechnical BulletinsResources
White Line

 

Environmental Laws

Brownfields Revitalization Act

MACT Standards

Boiler MACT

New Source Review

EPA Finalizes Revisions

Myth vs. Fact

Early Action Compact

Residual Risk Program

SPCC Plan

Pollutants

Mercury

Other

Avian Flu

Counter Terrorism

Flu Facts

Well Contractors
Certification


SpacerCounter-Terrorism
Gray Line

Page 2 of 5

Guideline for Preparing a Vulnerability Analysis for Correctional Facilities (cont.)

Equipment, Information, and Weapons

Identify:

  • location of vital equipment rooms, e.g., electrical power sources, communication, information systems, backup power sources, and medical supplies (drugs)
  • location of vital information that could cause a breach in security or other serious consequences
  • location and type of equipment that can be used by inmates, such as tools and weights
  • location and number of weapons available to the COs
  • old and outdated equipment and the prospect for future upgrades

Past/Present/Future Considerations

Identify:

  • incidents that have occurred and a detailed model of how the event occurred
  • any intelligence information that indicates any future activities and how it could be accomplished
  • number of inmates and their classification in the past, present, and future

Defining the Threat

Threat analysis is a study of the types of potential adversaries and their tactics, potential actions, motivations, and capabilities. Through this analysis, a facility should be able to match their security system elements to their needs. When defining the threat the analyst should identify those threats that are common to a correctional facility, keeping in mind that the facility must maintain the safety of the public, staff, and inmates. The three common security needs that exist in correctional institutions include preventing inmate violence, deterring escapes, and deterring the introduction of contraband. Threat analysis involves a systematic review of the type of incidents that have occurred not only in the past, but what is happening today, and what might be expected in the future. When defining the threat the following list should be considered:

Inmate Violence

Determine or estimate:

  • types and classifications of inmates likely to be involved
  • type of violence, whether against another individual, between gangs (number of subjects), or against the staff
  • motivation for the violence
  • time of the occurrence and whether day or night
  • frequency of occurrence
  • severity of the violence
  • specific locations (physical room layout) where violence can and has occurred
  • type of weapons used in committing the acts
  • historical violence trends and future predictions, using past records and intelligence information

Escape

For any past incidents and expected future incidents, describe details of the scenario presented by the inmate(s), including:

  • inmate tactics, weapons, escape path, tools used, transportation, the time of day, and weather
  • characteristics of inmate likely to attempt escape
  • possibility of inmate(s) acting in collusion with anyone from the outside and/or staff
  • use of deceit, force, and stealth in the attempt
  • historical data trends and future predictions, using past records and intelligence information

Contraband

Determine or estimate:

  • type of contraband brought into the facility, i.e. weapons, drugs, money, and electronic devices
  • means by which the contraband introduced into the facility, i.e. visitor areas, daily deliveries, and staff
  • motivation for smuggling contraband
  • frequency of contraband smuggling
  • how the contraband is packaged
  • ownership of the contraband and if it is associated with a specific group or activity
  • whether the contraband is associated with specific acts of violence or escape
  • historical data trends and future predictions, using past records and intelligence information

Once the threats have been defined, the analyst prioritizes the types in order of consequence.

These threat activities can be accomplished either individually or in collusion with someone else. For the purpose of this guide the insider is defined as anyone who has authorized and routine access to the facility. This definition includes administrative staff, COs, inmates, and contractors/vendors performing normally scheduled activities. When considering the threat of the insider, several attributes related to knowledge, access, and authority must be identified.

  • All employees are a potential threat. Insiders will have system knowledge, which gives them an advantage over other adversaries and makes them more valuable to an inmate.
  • Insiders have authorized access to most areas within the facility and, in some cases, have access to contraband or physical security systems because of their jobs.
  • Under emergency conditions, insiders know where certain people go, what they do, and what unique vulnerabilities or opportunities exist.
  • Insiders have routine access to contraband and security systems without causing suspicion.
  • Insiders have the same motivations as outsiders. It cannot be assumed that since a person is an employee that he or she will be free from greed and dissatisfaction. Insiders are vulnerable to coercion and cooperation with others.

Outsiders are those persons who attempt to gain access to the facility but have limited knowledge of the facility, vital equipment, and policy/procedures. Due to their limited authorization and area access, visitors to the facility are considered outsiders.

 

Continue

1 l 2 l 3 l 4 l 5

 Gray Dotted Line